Greg In The Desert

Lifehacker compares Vista’s BitLocker vs. FileVault. They like BitLocker better.

OS Encryption Showdown: Vista’s BitLocker vs. Mac’s FileVault – Lifehacker

FileVault encrypts the users’s home directory and all the files in it. As you read and write files to your home directory, in the background, FileVault encrypts and decrypts those files on the fly. Only the user’s login password can decrypt and mount this drive image, so at login the home directory becomes available as usual – its icon, however, looks like a lock. To other users on the same Mac, however, all files in the user’s home directory cannot be accessed.

BitLocker doesn’t just encrypt the user’s files, it encryptes the entire operating system partition, including Windows files, all your software applications as well as all the users’ data stored on the drive. You create a USB key with the password on it and plug it into your PC in order to start it (like a key for your car.) BitLocker uses a small boot partition to check for the right password, and only boots up if it’s present. If not, the hard drive is completely inaccessible.

This Mac mini review, I can’t figure out if it’s a serious review or a joke.

…its sleek look comes at the expense of the parallel port, serial ports, the PS/2 ports and the drive bays… did I forget to mention that the Mini has no PCI slots either? And no floppy disk drive? Well, no wonder they got the unit to be so small… or I could grab an equally stylish, full-featured eMachine at the gas station with a bag of chips for less than half the Mini’s price, with the added benefit of being able to run Windows XP. Decisions, decisions… The Mini boots up into a stripped-down operating system which Apple calls OS X, similar to the stripped-down WindowsCE OS found on many handhelds

I admit to being an Apple Fan Boy, so my opinion might be a little biased. But it’s so close to completely missing the point, it must be a joke.